Address PR feedback, clean up new regression test

The new regression test now avoids casting the query to a string and
inspecting the string, which was brittle at best.

The new approach asserts directly against `queryset.distinct` for the
main query and then finds the subquery that we expect to have distinct
set and verifies that is in fact the case.

I also realized that the use of `connection.query_log` was problematic,
in that it didn't seem to return any queries as expected. This meant
that the test was actually not making any assertions since none of the
code inside of the for loop over `device_queries` ever ran.

netbox/extras/tests/test_models.py

@@ -1,16 +1,14 @@
-import re
 import tempfile
 from pathlib import Path
 
 from django.contrib.contenttypes.models import ContentType
 from django.core.files.uploadedfile import SimpleUploadedFile
-from django.db import connection
 from django.forms import ValidationError
 from django.test import tag, TestCase
 
 from core.models import DataSource, ObjectType
 from dcim.models import Device, DeviceRole, DeviceType, Location, Manufacturer, Platform, Region, Site, SiteGroup
-from extras.models import ConfigContext, ConfigContextProfile, ConfigTemplate, ImageAttachment, Tag
+from extras.models import ConfigContext, ConfigContextProfile, ConfigTemplate, ImageAttachment, Tag, TaggedItem
 from tenancy.models import Tenant, TenantGroup
 from utilities.exceptions import AbortRequest
 from virtualization.models import Cluster, ClusterGroup, ClusterType, VirtualMachine
@@ -661,26 +659,38 @@ class ConfigContextTest(TestCase):
         Verifies that DISTINCT is only used in tag subquery where needed,
         not on the main device query which is expensive for large datasets.
         """
-        # Use existing test device from ConfigContextTest setup
         device = Device.objects.first()
+        queryset = Device.objects.filter(pk=device.pk).annotate_config_context_data()
 
-        # connection.queries_log.clear()
+        # Main device query should NOT use DISTINCT
+        self.assertFalse(queryset.query.distinct)
 
-        # Execute annotation
-        list(Device.objects.filter(pk=device.pk).annotate_config_context_data())
+        # Check that tag subqueries DO use DISTINCT by inspecting the annotation
+        config_annotation = queryset.query.annotations.get('config_context_data')
+        self.assertIsNotNone(config_annotation)
 
-        device_queries = [q['sql'] for q in connection.queries_log if 'dcim_device' in q['sql']]
+        def find_tag_subqueries(where_node):
+            """Find subqueries in WHERE clause that relate to tag filtering"""
+            subqueries = []
 
-        for query in device_queries:
-            # Main device query should NOT use DISTINCT
-            self.assertNotIn('SELECT DISTINCT "dcim_device"', query)
+            def traverse(node):
+                if hasattr(node, 'children'):
+                    for child in node.children:
+                        try:
+                            if child.rhs.query.model is TaggedItem:
+                                subqueries.append(child.rhs.query)
+                        except AttributeError:
+                            traverse(child)
+            traverse(where_node)
+            return subqueries
 
-            # Tag sub-query _should_ use DISTINCT
-            tag_distinct_pattern = re.compile(
-                r'SELECT DISTINCT \w+\."tag_id".*FROM "extras_taggeditem" \w+ INNER JOIN "django_content_type"'
-            )
-            distinct_tag_pattern_found = any(tag_distinct_pattern.search(query) for query in device_queries)
-            self.assertTrue(distinct_tag_pattern_found)
+        # Find subqueries in the WHERE clause that should have DISTINCT
+        tag_subqueries = find_tag_subqueries(config_annotation.query.where)
+        distinct_subqueries = [sq for sq in tag_subqueries if sq.distinct]
+
+        # Verify we found at least one DISTINCT subquery for tags
+        self.assertEqual(len(distinct_subqueries), 1)
+        self.assertTrue(distinct_subqueries[0].distinct)
 
 
 class ConfigTemplateTest(TestCase):