Fixes #19918: Resolve {module} placeholders in nested module bay labels
Some checks are pending
CI / build (20.x, 3.10) (push) Waiting to run
CI / build (20.x, 3.11) (push) Waiting to run
CI / build (20.x, 3.12) (push) Waiting to run
CodeQL / Analyze (${{ matrix.language }}) (none, actions) (push) Waiting to run
CodeQL / Analyze (${{ matrix.language }}) (none, javascript-typescript) (push) Waiting to run
CodeQL / Analyze (${{ matrix.language }}) (none, python) (push) Waiting to run

ModuleBayTemplate.instantiate() now calls resolve_name() and resolve_label()
to properly resolve {module} placeholders, making it consistent with other
modular components like InterfaceTemplate.

When a module with nested module bays is installed (e.g., a module with SFP
bays in position "A"), the nested bay labels now correctly show "A-21" instead
of "{module}-21".

This also removes the inconsistent fix from #17436 which only handled name
resolution post-instantiation. The proper resolution now happens during
instantiation using the existing resolve methods.
This commit is contained in:
Jason Novinger 2025-12-05 17:43:20 -06:00 committed by Jeremy Stretch
parent c6672538ac
commit 269112a565
3 changed files with 50 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -681,8 +681,8 @@ class ModuleBayTemplate(ModularComponentTemplateModel):
def instantiate(self, **kwargs):
return self.component_model(
name=self.name,
label=self.label,
name=self.resolve_name(kwargs.get('module')),
label=self.resolve_label(kwargs.get('module')),
position=self.position,
**kwargs
)

View File

@ -7,7 +7,6 @@ from django.utils.translation import gettext_lazy as _
from jsonschema.exceptions import ValidationError as JSONValidationError
from dcim.choices import *
from dcim.constants import MODULE_TOKEN
from dcim.utils import update_interface_bridges
from extras.models import ConfigContextModel, CustomField
from netbox.models import PrimaryModel
@ -331,7 +330,6 @@ class Module(PrimaryModel, ConfigContextModel):
else:
# ModuleBays must be saved individually for MPTT
for instance in create_instances:
instance.name = instance.name.replace(MODULE_TOKEN, str(self.module_bay.position))
instance.save()
update_fields = ['module']

View File

@ -792,8 +792,54 @@ class ModuleBayTestCase(TestCase):
)
device.consoleports.first()
def test_nested_module_token(self):
pass
@tag('regression') # #19918
def test_nested_module_bay_label_resolution(self):
"""Test that nested module bay labels properly resolve {module} placeholders"""
manufacturer = Manufacturer.objects.first()
site = Site.objects.first()
device_role = DeviceRole.objects.first()
# Create device type with module bay template (position='A')
device_type = DeviceType.objects.create(
manufacturer=manufacturer,
model='Device with Bays',
slug='device-with-bays'
)
ModuleBayTemplate.objects.create(
device_type=device_type,
name='Bay A',
position='A'
)
# Create module type with nested bay template using {module} placeholder
module_type = ModuleType.objects.create(
manufacturer=manufacturer,
model='Module with Nested Bays'
)
ModuleBayTemplate.objects.create(
module_type=module_type,
name='SFP {module}-21',
label='{module}-21',
position='21'
)
# Create device and install module
device = Device.objects.create(
name='Test Device',
device_type=device_type,
role=device_role,
site=site
)
module_bay = device.modulebays.get(name='Bay A')
module = Module.objects.create(
device=device,
module_bay=module_bay,
module_type=module_type
)
# Verify nested bay label resolves {module} to parent position
nested_bay = module.modulebays.get(name='SFP A-21')
self.assertEqual(nested_bay.label, 'A-21')
class CableTestCase(TestCase):