"Full depth" sounds kind of unreasonable, doesn't it?

Plugin-Certification-Program.md

@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ Every certified plugin's documentation and release notes must meet minimum crite
   - Brief installation instructions which do not assume deep user familiarity with plugins generally, and which when followed exactly will result in a functioning plugin.
   - A summary of where and how to engage with the plugin's maintainer team for bug reports, feature requests, and documentation requests (GitHub issues, Slack, etc.)
   - A summary of where and how to seek operational support as a user of the plugin (GitHub discussions, Slack, etc.)
-- The plugin's main documentation must treat each of the points in the README in fuller depth. To minimize redundancy, linking into the main documentation from the top-level README is encouraged, particularly concerning the concise introduction.
+- The plugin's main documentation must treat each of the points in the README in further depth. To minimize redundancy, linking into the main documentation from the top-level README is encouraged, particularly concerning the concise introduction.
 - Plugin documentation may not consist solely of a top-level README unless the plugin's scope is exceptionally small.
 - Plugin's release notes must open with a brief narrative summary characterizing it as a major, minor, or patch release and indicating whether it consists of bug fixes, new features, enhancements to existing features, or all of the above.
 - Any time a release introduces breaking changes, the release notes must include a bold header reading *Breaking Changes* under which a brief summary of each such change is provided, including links to each relevant issue.