NeoAnd/netbox
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/netbox-community/netbox.git synced 2025-07-28 11:26:26 -06:00
Code Issues Actions 8 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fixes #3324: Doc incorrectly states child devices shown as non-racked

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Lasse Bang Mikkelsen 2019-07-04 17:28:25 +02:00
parent ad21710114
commit 348365e6d4
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
docs/core-functionality/devices.md
View File

@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ Pass-through ports can also be used to model "bump in the wire" devices, such as
### Device Bays
Device bays represent the ability of a device to house child devices. For example, you might install four blade servers into a 2U chassis. The chassis would appear in the rack elevation as a 2U device with four device bays. Each server within it would be defined as a 0U device installed in one of the device bays. Child devices do not appear within rack elevations, but they are included in the "Non-Racked Devices" list within the rack view.
Device bays represent the ability of a device to house child devices. For example, you might install four blade servers into a 2U chassis. The chassis would appear in the rack elevation as a 2U device with four device bays. Each server within it would be defined as a 0U device installed in one of the device bays. Child devices do not appear within rack elevations or the "Non-Racked Devices" list within the rack view.
Child devices are first-class Devices in their own right: that is, fully independent managed entities which don't share any control plane with the parent. Just like normal devices, child devices have their own platform (OS), role, tags, and interfaces. You cannot create a LAG between interfaces in different child devices.