Docling/tests/data/groundtruth/docling_v2/pone.0234687.xml.itxt

item-0 at level 0: unspecified: group _root_
  item-1 at level 1: title: Potential to reduce greenhouse g ...  cattle systems in subtropical regions
    item-2 at level 2: paragraph: Henrique M. N. Ribeiro-Filho, Maurício Civiero, Ermias Kebreab
    item-3 at level 2: paragraph: Department of Animal Science, Un ... atarina, Lages, Santa Catarina, Brazil
    item-4 at level 2: section_header: Abstract
      item-5 at level 3: text: Carbon (C) footprint of dairy pr ... uce the C footprint to a small extent.
    item-6 at level 2: section_header: Introduction
      item-7 at level 3: text: Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions f ... suitable for food crop production [4].
      item-8 at level 3: text: Considering the key role of live ... anagement to mitigate the C footprint.
      item-9 at level 3: text: In subtropical climate zones, co ... t in tropical pastures (e.g. [17–19]).
      item-10 at level 3: text: It has been shown that dairy cow ... sions from crop and reduced DM intake.
      item-11 at level 3: text: The aim of this work was to quan ... uring lactation periods was evaluated.
    item-12 at level 2: section_header: Materials and methods
      item-13 at level 3: text: An LCA was developed according t ... 90816 - https://www.udesc.br/cav/ceua.
      item-14 at level 3: section_header: System boundary
        item-15 at level 4: text: The goal of the study was to ass ... n were outside of the system boundary.
        item-16 at level 4: picture
          item-16 at level 5: caption: Fig 1 Overview of the milk production system boundary considered in the study.
      item-17 at level 3: section_header: Functional unit
        item-18 at level 4: text: The functional unit was one kilo ... tein according to NRC [20] as follows:
        item-19 at level 4: text: ECM = Milk production × (0.0929  ...  characteristics described in Table 1.
        item-20 at level 4: table with [13x3]
          item-20 at level 5: caption: Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of the herd.
      item-21 at level 3: section_header: Data sources and livestock system description
        item-22 at level 4: text: The individual feed requirements ... ed to the ad libitum TMR intake group.
        item-23 at level 4: text: Using experimental data, three s ... med during an entire lactation period.
      item-24 at level 3: section_header: Impact assessment
        item-25 at level 4: text: The CO2e emissions were calculat ... 65 for CO2, CH4 and N2O, respectively.
      item-26 at level 3: section_header: Feed production
        item-27 at level 4: section_header: Diets composition
          item-28 at level 5: text: The DM intake of each ingredient ...  collected throughout the experiments.
          item-29 at level 5: table with [21x11]
            item-29 at level 6: caption: Table 2 Dairy cows’ diets in different scenariosa.
        item-30 at level 4: section_header: GHG emissions from crop and pasture production
          item-31 at level 5: text: GHG emission factors used for of ... onsume 70% of pastures during grazing.
          item-32 at level 5: table with [9x5]
            item-32 at level 6: caption: Table 3 GHG emission factors for Off- and On-farm feed production.
          item-33 at level 5: text: Emissions from on-farm feed prod ... factors described by Rotz et al. [42].
          item-34 at level 5: table with [28x5]
            item-34 at level 6: caption: Table 4 GHG emissions from On-farm feed production.
      item-35 at level 3: section_header: Animal husbandry
        item-36 at level 4: text: The CH4 emissions from enteric f ... 1) = 13.8 + 0.185 × NDF (% DM intake).
      item-37 at level 3: section_header: Manure from confined cows and urine and dung from grazing animals
        item-38 at level 4: text: The CH4 emission from manure (kg ... for dietary GE per kg of DM (MJ kg-1).
        item-39 at level 4: text: The OM digestibility was estimat ... h were 31%, 26% and 46%, respectively.
        item-40 at level 4: text: The N2O-N emissions from urine a ...  using the IPCC [38] emission factors.
      item-41 at level 3: section_header: Farm management
        item-42 at level 4: text: Emissions due to farm management ...  crop and pasture production’ section.
        item-43 at level 4: table with [12x4]
          item-43 at level 5: caption: Table 5 Factors for major resource inputs in farm management.
        item-44 at level 4: text: The amount of fuel use for manur ... me that animals stayed on confinement.
        item-45 at level 4: text: The emissions from fuel were est ...  × kg CO2e (kg machinery mass)-1 [42].
        item-46 at level 4: text: Emissions from electricity for m ... ws in naturally ventilated barns [47].
      item-47 at level 3: section_header: Co-product allocation
        item-48 at level 4: text: The C footprint for milk produce ...  directly assigned to milk production.
      item-49 at level 3: section_header: Sensitivity analysis
        item-50 at level 4: text: A sensitivity index was calculat ... ses a similar change in the footprint.
    item-51 at level 2: section_header: Results and discussion
      item-52 at level 3: text: The study has assessed the impac ... , feed production and electricity use.
      item-53 at level 3: section_header: Greenhouse gas emissions
        item-54 at level 4: text: Depending on emission factors us ... more than 5% of overall GHG emissions.
        item-55 at level 4: picture
          item-55 at level 5: caption: Fig 2 Overall greenhouse gas emissions in dairy cattle systems under various scenarios. TMR = ad libitum TMR intake, 75TMR = 75% of ad libitum TMR intake with access to pasture, 50TMR = 50% of ad libitum TMR intake with access to pasture. (a) N2O emission factors for urine and dung from IPCC [38], feed production emission factors from Table 3 without accounting for sequestered CO2-C from perennial pasture, production of electricity = 0.73 kg CO2e kWh-1 [41]. (b) N2O emission factors for urine and dung from IPCC [38], feed production emission factors from Table 3 without accounting for sequestered CO2-C from perennial pasture, production of electricity = 0.205 kg CO2e kWh-1 [46]; (c) N2O emission factors for urine and dung from local data [37], feed production EF from Table 4 without accounting for sequestered CO2-C from perennial pasture, production of electricity = 0.205 kg CO2e kWh-1 [46]. (d) N2O emission factors for urine and dung from local data [37], feed production emission factors from Table 4 accounting for sequestered CO2-C from perennial pasture, production of electricity = 0.205 kg CO2e kWh-1 [46].
        item-56 at level 4: text: Considering IPCC emission factor ...  the C footprint of the dairy systems.
        item-57 at level 4: text: The similarity of C footprint be ... of TMR was replaced by pasture access.
        item-58 at level 4: text: The lower C footprint in scenari ... r, averaging 0.004 kg N2O-N kg-1 [37].
      item-59 at level 3: section_header: Methane emissions
        item-60 at level 4: text: The enteric CH4 intensity was si ... ], which did not happen in this study.
        item-61 at level 4: picture
          item-61 at level 5: caption: Fig 3 Sensitivity of the C footprint. Sensitivity index = percentage change in C footprint for a 10% change in the given emission source divided by 10% of. (a) N2O emission factors for urine and dung from IPCC [38], feed production emission factors from Table 3, production of electricity = 0.73 kg CO2e kWh-1 [41]. (b) N2O emission factors for urine and dung from IPCC [38], feed production emission factors from Table 3, production of electricity = 0.205 kg CO2e kWh-1 [46]; (c) N2O emission factors for urine and dung from local data [37], feed production EF from Table 4 without accounting sequestered CO2-C from perennial pasture, production of electricity = 0.205 kg CO2e kWh-1 [46]. (d) N2O emission factors for urine and dung from local data [37], feed production emission factors from Table 4 accounting sequestered CO2-C from perennial pasture, production of electricity = 0.205 kg CO2e kWh-1 [46].
        item-62 at level 4: text: The lack of difference in enteri ...  same scenarios as in this study [26].
      item-63 at level 3: section_header: Emissions from excreta and feed production
        item-64 at level 4: text: Using IPCC emission factors for  ...  may not be captured by microbes [65].
        item-65 at level 4: picture
          item-65 at level 5: caption: Fig 4 Greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) from manure and feed production in dairy cattle systems. TMR = ad libitum TMR intake, 75TMR = 75% of ad libitum TMR intake with access to pasture, 50TMR = 50% of ad libitum TMR intake with access to pasture. (a) N2O emission factors for urine and dung from IPCC [38]. (b) Feed production emission factors from Table 3. (c) N2O emission factors for urine and dung from local data [37]. (d) Feed production emission factors from Table 4 accounting sequestered CO2-C from perennial pasture.
        item-66 at level 4: text: Using local emission factors for ... be revised for the subtropical region.
        item-67 at level 4: text: Emissions for feed production de ... act, particularly in confinements [9].
      item-68 at level 3: section_header: Farm management
        item-69 at level 4: text: The lower impact of emissions fr ...  greater than 5% of total C footprint.
        item-70 at level 4: text: Emissions from farm management d ...  gas and hard coal, respectively [46].
      item-71 at level 3: section_header: Assumptions and limitations
        item-72 at level 4: text: The milk production and composit ... ions as a function of soil management.
      item-73 at level 3: section_header: Further considerations
        item-74 at level 4: text: The potential for using pasture  ... g ECM)-1 in case of foot lesions [72].
        item-75 at level 4: text: Grazing lands may also improve b ... hange of CO2 would be negligible [76].
    item-76 at level 2: section_header: Conclusions
      item-77 at level 3: text: This study assessed the C footpr ... on with or without access to pastures.
    item-78 at level 2: section_header: Acknowledgments
      item-79 at level 3: text: Thanks to Anna Naranjo for helpf ...  of the herd considered in this study.
    item-80 at level 2: section_header: References
      item-81 at level 3: list: group list
        item-82 at level 4: list_item: IPCC. Climate Change and Land. Chapter 5: Food Security. 2019.
        item-83 at level 4: list_item: HerreroM, HendersonB, HavlíkP, T ...  2016;6: 452–461. 10.1038/nclimate2925
        item-84 at level 4: list_item: Rivera-FerreMG, López-i-GelatsF, ... hang. 2016;7: 869–892. 10.1002/wcc.421
        item-85 at level 4: list_item: van ZantenHHE, MollenhorstH, Klo ... 21: 747–758. 10.1007/s11367-015-0944-1
        item-86 at level 4: list_item: HristovAN, OhJ, FirkinsL, Dijkst ... 5–5069. 10.2527/jas.2013-6583 24045497
        item-87 at level 4: list_item: HristovAN, OttT, TricaricoJ, Rot ... 5–5113. 10.2527/jas.2013-6585 24045470
        item-88 at level 4: list_item: MontesF, MeinenR, DellC, RotzA,  ... 0–5094. 10.2527/jas.2013-6584 24045493
        item-89 at level 4: list_item: LedgardSF, WeiS, WangX, Falconer ... : 155–163. 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.10.009
        item-90 at level 4: list_item: O’BrienD, ShallooL, PattonJ, Buc ... 107: 33–46. 10.1016/j.agsy.2011.11.004
        item-91 at level 4: list_item: SalouT, Le MouëlC, van der WerfH ... od. 2017 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.019
        item-92 at level 4: list_item: LizarraldeC, PicassoV, RotzCA, C ... gric Res. 2014;3: 1 10.5539/sar.v3n2p1
        item-93 at level 4: list_item: ClarkCEF, KaurR, MillapanLO, Gol ... –5465. 10.3168/jds.2017-13388 29550132
        item-94 at level 4: list_item: Food and Agriculture Organization. FAOSTAT. 2017.
        item-95 at level 4: list_item: VogelerI, MackayA, VibartR, Rend ... .1016/j.scitotenv.2016.05.006 27203517
        item-96 at level 4: list_item: WilkinsonJM, LeeMRF, RiveroMJ, C ... 0;75: 1–17. 10.1111/gfs.12458 32109974
        item-97 at level 4: list_item: WalesWJ, MarettLC, GreenwoodJS,  ... i. 2013;53: 1167–1178. 10.1071/AN13207
        item-98 at level 4: list_item: BargoF, MullerLD, DelahoyJE, Cas ... 168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74381-6 12487461
        item-99 at level 4: list_item: VibartRE, FellnerV, BurnsJC, Hun ... 80. 10.1017/S0022029908003361 18701000
        item-100 at level 4: list_item: MendozaA, CajarvilleC, RepettoJL ... –1944. 10.3168/jds.2015-10257 26778319
        item-101 at level 4: list_item: NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Da ... gton DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
        item-102 at level 4: list_item: INRA. INRA Feeding System for Ru ... shiers; 2018 10.3920/978-90-8686-872-8
        item-103 at level 4: list_item: LorenzH, ReinschT, HessS, TaubeF ... 161–170. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.113
        item-104 at level 4: list_item: ISO 14044. INTERNATIONAL STANDAR ... rements and guidelines. 2006;2006: 46.
        item-105 at level 4: list_item: ISO 14040. The International Sta ... ;2006: 1–28. 10.1136/bmj.332.7550.1107
        item-106 at level 4: list_item: FAO. Environmental Performance o ... nerships/leap/resources/guidelines/en/
        item-107 at level 4: list_item: CivieroM, Ribeiro-FilhoHMN, Scha ... nce,. Foz do Iguaçu; 2019 pp. 141–141.
        item-108 at level 4: list_item: IPCC—Intergovernmental Panel on  ... /2018/05/SYR_AR5_FINAL_full_wcover.pdf
        item-109 at level 4: list_item: INRA. Alimentation des bovins, o ... Inra 2007. 4th ed. INRA, editor. 2007.
        item-110 at level 4: list_item: DelagardeR, FaverdinP, BaratteC, ... 5–60. 10.1111/j.1365-2494.2010.00770.x
        item-111 at level 4: list_item: MaBL, LiangBC, BiswasDK, Morriso ... 2;94: 15–31. 10.1007/s10705-012-9522-0
        item-112 at level 4: list_item: RauccciGS, MoreiraCS, AlvesPS, M ... State. J Clean Prod. 2015;96: 418–425.
        item-113 at level 4: list_item: CamargoGGT, RyanMR, RichardTL. E ... 3;63: 263–273. 10.1525/bio.2013.63.4.6
        item-114 at level 4: list_item: da SilvaMSJ, JobimCC, PoppiEC, T ... 3–313. 10.1590/S1806-92902015000900001
        item-115 at level 4: list_item: Duchini PGPGGuzatti GCGC, Ribeir ... Sci. 2016;67: 574–581. 10.1071/CP15170
        item-116 at level 4: list_item: ScaravelliLFB, PereiraLET, Olivo ... teiras. Cienc Rural. 2007;37: 841–846.
        item-117 at level 4: list_item: SbrissiaAF, DuchiniPG, ZaniniGD, ... : 945–954. 10.2135/cropsci2017.07.0447
        item-118 at level 4: list_item: AlmeidaJGR, Dall-OrsolettaAC, Oz ... 12. 10.1017/S1751731119003057 31907089
        item-119 at level 4: list_item: Intergovernamental Panel on Clim ... Global Environmental Strategies; 2006.
        item-120 at level 4: list_item: RamalhoB, DieckowJ, BarthG, Simo ... il Sci. 2020; 1–14. 10.1111/ejss.12933
        item-121 at level 4: list_item: FernandesHC, da SilveiraJCM, Rin ... –1587. 10.1590/s1413-70542008000500034
        item-122 at level 4: list_item: Wang M Q. GREET 1.8a Spreadsheet ... transportation.anl.gov/software/GREET/
        item-123 at level 4: list_item: RotzCAA, MontesF, ChianeseDS, Ch ... 6–1282. 10.3168/jds.2009-2162 20172247
        item-124 at level 4: list_item: NiuM, KebreabE, HristovAN, OhJ,  ...  3368–3389. 10.1111/gcb.14094 29450980
        item-125 at level 4: list_item: EugèneM, SauvantD, NozièreP, Via ... 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.086 30602259
        item-126 at level 4: list_item: ReedKF, MoraesLE, CasperDP, Kebr ... 5–3035. 10.3168/jds.2014-8397 25747829
        item-127 at level 4: list_item: BarrosMV, PiekarskiCM, De Franci ... . Energies. 2018;11 10.3390/en11061412
        item-128 at level 4: list_item: LudingtonD, JohnsonE. Dairy Farm ...  York State Energy Res Dev Auth. 2003.
        item-129 at level 4: list_item: ThomaG, JollietO, WangY. A bioph ...  2013;31 10.1016/j.idairyj.2012.08.012
        item-130 at level 4: list_item: NaranjoA, JohnsonA, RossowH. Gre ... . 2020 10.3168/jds.2019-16576 32037166
        item-131 at level 4: list_item: JayasundaraS, WordenD, WeersinkA ... 18–1028. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.013
        item-132 at level 4: list_item: WilliamsSRO, FisherPD, Berrisfor ... 4;19: 69–78. 10.1007/s11367-013-0619-8
        item-133 at level 4: list_item: GollnowS, LundieS, MooreAD, McLa ... : 31–38. 10.1016/j.idairyj.2014.02.005
        item-134 at level 4: list_item: O’BrienD, CapperJL, GarnsworthyP ... i. 2014 10.3168/jds.2013-7174 24440256
        item-135 at level 4: list_item: ChobtangJ, McLarenSJ, LedgardSF, ... 2017;21: 1139–1152. 10.1111/jiec.12484
        item-136 at level 4: list_item: GargMR, PhondbaBT, SherasiaPL, M ... Sci. 2016;56: 423–436. 10.1071/AN15464
        item-137 at level 4: list_item: de LéisCM, CherubiniE, RuviaroCF ... 5;20: 46–60. 10.1007/s11367-014-0813-3
        item-138 at level 4: list_item: O’BrienD, GeogheganA, McNamaraK, ... Sci. 2016;56: 495–500. 10.1071/AN15490
        item-139 at level 4: list_item: O’BrienD, BrennanP, HumphreysJ,  ... : 1469–1481. 10.1007/s11367-014-0755-9
        item-140 at level 4: list_item: BaekCY, LeeKM, ParkKH. Quantific ... : 50–60. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.02.010
        item-141 at level 4: list_item: Dall-OrsolettaAC, AlmeidaJGR, Ca ... –4383. 10.3168/jds.2015-10396 27016830
        item-142 at level 4: list_item: Dall-OrsolettaAC, OziemblowskiMM ... 5–73. 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2019.05.009
        item-143 at level 4: list_item: NiuM, AppuhamyJADRN, LeytemAB, D ... Sci. 2016;56: 312–321. 10.1071/AN15498
        item-144 at level 4: list_item: WaghornGC, LawN, BryantM, Pachec ... i. 2019;59: 1261–1270. 10.1071/AN18018
        item-145 at level 4: list_item: DickhoeferU, GlowackiS, GómezCA, ...  109–118. 10.1016/j.livsci.2018.08.004
        item-146 at level 4: list_item: SchwabCG, BroderickGA. A 100-Yea ... 10112. 10.3168/jds.2017-13320 29153157
        item-147 at level 4: list_item: SordiA, DieckowJ, BayerC, Alburq ... 90: 94–103. 10.1016/j.agee.2013.09.004
        item-148 at level 4: list_item: SimonPL, DieckowJ, de KleinCAM,  ... 267: 74–82. 10.1016/j.agee.2018.08.013
        item-149 at level 4: list_item: WangX, LedgardS, LuoJ, GuoY, Zha ... .1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.259 29291563
        item-150 at level 4: list_item: PirloG, LolliS. Environmental im ... 962–971. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.11.070
        item-151 at level 4: list_item: HerzogA, WincklerC, ZollitschW.  ... 7: 174–187. 10.1016/j.agee.2018.07.029
        item-152 at level 4: list_item: MostertPF, van MiddelaarCE, Bokk ... od. 2018 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.019
        item-153 at level 4: list_item: MostertPF, van MiddelaarCE, de B ... 7: 206–212. 10.1016/j.agsy.2018.09.006
        item-154 at level 4: list_item: FoleyJA, RamankuttyN, BraumanKA, ...  337–342. 10.1038/nature10452 21993620
        item-155 at level 4: list_item: LalR. Soil Carbon Sequestration  ... 1627. 10.1126/science.1097396 15192216
        item-156 at level 4: list_item: BoddeyRM, JantaliaCP, ConceiçaoP ... –795. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.02020.x
        item-157 at level 4: list_item: McConkeyB, AngersD, BenthamM, Bo ...  the LULUCF sector for NIR 2014. 2014.
  item-158 at level 1: caption: Fig 1 Overview of the milk produ ... stem boundary considered in the study.
  item-159 at level 1: caption: Table 1 Descriptive characteristics of the herd.
  item-160 at level 1: caption: Table 2 Dairy cows’ diets in different scenariosa.
  item-161 at level 1: caption: Table 3 GHG emission factors for Off- and On-farm feed production.
  item-162 at level 1: caption: Table 4 GHG emissions from On-farm feed production.
  item-163 at level 1: caption: Table 5 Factors for major resource inputs in farm management.
  item-164 at level 1: caption: Fig 2 Overall greenhouse gas emi ... lectricity = 0.205 kg CO2e kWh-1 [46].
  item-165 at level 1: caption: Fig 3 Sensitivity of the C footp ... lectricity = 0.205 kg CO2e kWh-1 [46].
  item-166 at level 1: caption: Fig 4 Greenhouse gas emissions ( ... uestered CO2-C from perennial pasture.